Current:Home > ContactFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -CryptoBase
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-18 00:43:59
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (2625)
Related
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Abortion is on the California ballot. But does that mean at any point in pregnancy?
- State legislative races are on the front lines of democracy this midterm cycle
- Love & Death’s Tom Pelphrey Details the “Challenging” Process of Playing Lawyer Don Crowder
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- You're 50, And Your Body Is Changing: Time For The Talk
- NASA mission to the sun answers questions about solar wind that causes aurora borealis
- PHOTOS: If you had to leave home and could take only 1 keepsake, what would it be?
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Arkansas family tries to navigate wave of anti-trans legislation
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- After State Rejects Gas Pipeline Permit, Utility Pushes Back. One Result: New Buildings Go Electric.
- Suburbs delivered recent wins for Georgia Democrats. This year, they're up for grabs
- They inhaled asbestos for decades on the job. Now, workers break their silence
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- In close races, Republicans attack Democrats over fentanyl and the overdose crisis
- A kind word meant everything to Carolyn Hax as her mom battled ALS
- Bindi Irwin Shares Health Update After Painful, Decade-Long Endometriosis Journey
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Bachelor Nation's Brandon Jones and Serene Russell Break Up
Too Hot to Handle's Francesca Farago Flashes Her Massive 2-Stone Engagement Ring
The Air Around Aliso Canyon Is Declared Safe. So Why Are Families Still Suffering?
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
State legislative races are on the front lines of democracy this midterm cycle
A kind word meant everything to Carolyn Hax as her mom battled ALS
Environmental Groups Sue to Block Trump’s Endangered Species Act Rule Changes