Current:Home > MarketsWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -CryptoBase
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
View
Date:2025-04-17 20:23:47
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (558)
Related
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Boy, 3, dead after accidentally shooting himself in Tennessee
- How to Sell Green Energy
- Clifton Garvin
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Emily Ratajkowski Says She’s Waiting to Date the Right Woman in Discussion About Her Sexuality
- Today’s Climate: May 25, 2010
- Tearful Derek Hough Reflects on the Shock of Len Goodman’s Death
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Encore: An animal tranquilizer is making street drugs even more dangerous
Ranking
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- States Begin to Comply with Clean Power Plan, Even While Planning to Sue
- Pence officially files paperwork to run for president, kicking off 2024 bid
- Seeing God’s Hand in the Deadly Floods, Yet Wondering about Climate Change
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Protecting Norfolk from Flooding Won’t Be Cheap: Army Corps Releases Its Plan
- Lee Raymond
- Canada’s Tar Sands Pipelines Navigate a Tougher Political Landscape
Recommendation
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Today’s Climate: May 17, 2010
Today’s Climate: May 1-2, 2010
Ed Sheeran Wins in Copyright Trial Over Thinking Out Loud
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
World’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt
What's behind the FDA's controversial strategy for evaluating new COVID boosters
InsideClimate News Celebrates 10 Years of Hard-Hitting Journalism